Review: Spectators by Brian K Vaughan
Blurb:
A gripping and provocative graphic novel that takes a hard look at sex and violence, and the very different ways we obsessively watch both.
Hundreds of years in the future, New York City is haunted by many ghosts, including a voyeuristic woman who died in our present day and a mysterious gun-toting man from the distant past. Normally solo travelers, these two specters meet and travel around the world together, bearing witness to society's forward march toward decay.
Readers won't be able to look away as they watch with dark fascination how SPECTATORS explores the fine line between living and watching others live. Explicitly sexy and shockingly violent, this lavishly hand-painted epic is a thought-provoking, metaphysical masterpiece and the most ambitious collaboration yet between Pride of Baghdad artist Niko Henrichon and Saga writer Brian K. Vaughan.
Review:
The cover and description really piqued my interest when I saw this one. But I really underestimated how graphic this one was going to be. Younger me would’ve absolutely loved the raw and unfiltered exploration of the baser aspects of humanity. Present-day me also loved it.
Spoilers and some mentions of mature content ahead!
What I liked:
The story opens with Val, a forty-something single woman who’s waiting for her date in a movie theatre. Unfortunately for her, her date won’t be able to make it. From context, you can tell that she wasn’t really there to watch the film; she just wanted to fool around. But, since she’s left alone and hanging, she doesn’t hesitate to pull out her phone and visit an adult website. The artwork doesn’t shy away from showing you what she’s watching, the lust and longing unapologetically clear in her eyes.
And that is when things take a 180° turn. A lone gunman enters the theatre and starts shooting everyone. He’s apparently playing some kind of online challenge that requires him to get as high a kill count as possible to stay on the leaderboard. The violence is as graphic and brutal as the sex was on Val’s phone. Where the first half of this scene built up desire, the second half subverts it with shock and repulsion. An extreme depiction of the two most base human traits—love and hate.
In the aftermath, Val’s spirit rises from her body. She’s greeted by a different ghost who welcomes her to the afterlife. This isn’t your average afterlife. The spirits that roam in this realm of existence are mere spectators to the show of human existence. While most pass on to the next realm without a thought, many stay back to satiate their curiosity and desire to keep living via the people they watch.
The rest of the story isn’t all that spectacular. More like a conduit for Vaughan to exposit on the philosophy of existence, living, and more. I’m including this in the ‘what I liked’ section because I genuinely loved this exploration, verbal and visual, both. The world fast-forwards to centuries later, the baser needs of humanity still dictating technological development. Where the first scene showed adult websites and mass shootings, the future world shows an extremely advanced version of both.
As Val has been established as a voyeur, she goes around looking to satiate her unfulfilled desires by projecting that satisfaction onto the people she spectates. These acts range from love-making to outright debauchery. But the violent manner of her death has also made her want to witness scenes of extreme violence. If you think about it, we aren’t all that different from Val. After all, sex and violence make for two of the most sellable hooks on the internet, don’t they?
My favorite part of the graphic novel was undoubtedly the characters. Val and Sam like tour guides that you, the reader, are spectating as they, in turn, spectate their world. Over the course of some 344 pages, you learn about their lives, what made them who they were, shedding light on why they might be desiring the things they do in the afterlife. All this again brings us back to the ideas of what it really means to be alive. After all, in an increasingly voyeuristic society that’s addicted to other people’s projected social media appearance, how much are you living your real life?
One could interpret Spectators as a speculative commentary on our modern-day digital isolation. Every app, every megacorporation, is trying its best to keep your attention, even if it is in short spurts of 30 seconds. The adverse effects of social media have resulted in a growth of dissociative mental disorders. Perhaps, in accepting your digital existence, you’re slowly leaving behind your physical one. Social media has made content out of other peoples’ lives, and viewers are mere spectators who dissociate from their own to experience second-hand the lives of others. Much like the ghosts in Spectators.
I can’t say more without spoiling the graphic novel. But I have to admit that the book is not for everyone. The graphic parts are genuinely very graphic. If you can stomach the extreme, you’ll love this one. But if you’re easy to squirm, then you will probably not make it past the first couple of pages.
What I didn’t like:
The story itself is rather flat and straightforward. The character work and resulting discourse were brilliant, but it did leave something to be desired.
The more I think about it, the more I realize that the book itself was everything it promised to be. Looking at humanity and our dystopian future through the lens of sex and violence, a convoluted and graphic exploration of longing and living. Yet, something felt missing from the narrative.
Maybe a better-realized world would’ve made the expositions more impactful. Maybe the characters spectating world leaders engaged in baser human desires would’ve felt more compelling than just common people. I’m only speculating here, but those are things I personally believe would’ve elevated the graphic novel from what it is at the moment.
In Conclusion:
Spectators is a beautifully provocative and evocative ‘graphic’ novel that forces you to reflect upon what it really means to be alive in the modern age.
TL;DR:
What I liked: The artwork, the characters, philosophical discourse.
What I didn’t like: The plot and narrative felt wanting.